This 2-phase look up of g++ (gnu C++) seems not inconsistency: builtin types are not treat equivalent with user defined type.
#include <stdio.h> class A {}; void f(A) { printf("%s\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__); } class B {}; // now g(T) knew A,B,int,... // phase 1 lookup just success for f(A) template<class T> void g(T x) { f(x); } // after definition of g(T) and class B void f(B) { printf("%s\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__); } void f(int x) { printf("%s\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__); } void f(int*x) { printf("%s\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__); } int main(int argc, char** argv) { g(A()); // should always(phase 1 and phase 2) be OK g(B()); // f(B) definition is after g(T) definition, phase 1 just got f(A) g(B()); // but phase 2 got f(B) g(100); // intend to let g calling f(int), but failed in g++ 4.1 or newer g(&argc); // intention: similar as g(100) return 0; }
原文链接: https://www.cnblogs.com/rockeet/archive/2011/11/11/3666881.html
欢迎关注
微信关注下方公众号,第一时间获取干货硬货;公众号内回复【pdf】免费获取数百本计算机经典书籍
原创文章受到原创版权保护。转载请注明出处:https://www.ccppcoding.com/archives/36215
非原创文章文中已经注明原地址,如有侵权,联系删除
关注公众号【高性能架构探索】,第一时间获取最新文章
转载文章受原作者版权保护。转载请注明原作者出处!